Skip to main content
Back to Services
Compliance

Compliance Readiness Assessment

Know what your enterprise buyer's security team will find before they find it.

Enterprise security teams are no longer evaluating AI products like traditional SaaS. They want answers about RAG pipelines, vector databases, LLM integrations, training data flows, model access controls, and regulatory exposure. This assessment identifies the gaps most likely to stall a deal and gives you a sequenced remediation roadmap before your buyer finds the issue first.

Get a Quote

Overview

Enterprise procurement teams have a standard security review process. When that process reaches an AI-native company, the questions become specific: What data trained your model? Who controls the API keys? Can you demonstrate user data isolation in your vector database? What is your EU AI Act compliance posture?

Most AI-native founders are not unprepared because they built weak products. They are unprepared because standard SOC 2 preparation was built around traditional SaaS architecture, not RAG pipelines, vector databases, LLM gateways, model provenance, or AI-specific access controls.

A Compliance Readiness Assessment closes that gap. Your AI architecture is reviewed against the framework your buyer is likely using, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, ISO 27001 Annex A, EU AI Act requirements, NIST AI RMF, or ISO 42001, and converted into a written gap analysis with practical next steps.

This is not a general security audit. It is a targeted buyer-scenario assessment designed around the exact moment enterprise deals stall: when the product conversation becomes a security, compliance, and procurement conversation.

Ideal For

  • AI-native founders in active enterprise sales conversations
  • Teams with a vendor security questionnaire due in the next 30–60 days
  • Companies preparing for SOC 2 Type I, ISO 27001, or EU AI Act readiness
  • AI SaaS companies using RAG pipelines, vector databases, LLM APIs, or model orchestration layers
  • Founders who need to know what procurement and security teams will ask before the deal reaches review

What's Included

Comprehensive services tailored to your needs.

AI Architecture Review
  • RAG pipeline documentation and review
  • Vector database access control assessment
  • LLM integration and API key management review
  • Training data flow mapping
  • Model access control evaluation
  • AI system boundary and trust-layer review
Control Gap Analysis
  • SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria mapping against current posture
  • ISO 27001 Annex A gap identification where applicable
  • EU AI Act risk classification and obligation mapping
  • ISO 42001 alignment review where applicable
  • NIST AI RMF and NIST CSF alignment review
  • Buyer-question mapping for deal-stalling gaps
AI-Specific Risk Assessment
  • Prompt injection exposure assessment
  • LLM API key rotation gap identification
  • Vector database namespace enforcement review
  • Training data provenance documentation review
  • Embedding and cached chunk deletion review
  • Model output and decision explainability gap review
Readiness Deliverables
  • Written gap report with severity ratings
  • Control-by-control documentation of missing or weak controls
  • Evidence required to close each gap
  • Sequenced remediation roadmap with effort estimates
  • Pre-audit evidence checklist
  • Executive debrief and remediation planning session

The Process

A structured approach to deliver results with clear communication at every step.

01

Intake & Scoping

Days 1-2

We start by documenting your AI stack, target buyer requirements, active deal timeline, current compliance posture, and the framework most relevant to your enterprise sales motion.

02

Architecture Review

Days 3-5

Your system architecture, data flows, policy documents, infrastructure configuration, LLM integrations, vector databases, and training pipelines are reviewed for AI-specific compliance exposure.

03

Control Mapping

Days 5-8

Findings are mapped against the applicable framework controls. We identify what exists, what is missing, and what appears documented but is not strong enough for enterprise review.

04

Gap Analysis Report

Days 8-10

You receive a written report documenting each gap, its severity, the evidence required to close it, and the buyer or auditor question it is likely to trigger.

05

Remediation Roadmap & Debrief

Days 10-14

We walk through the findings, prioritize remediation based on risk and deal timeline, and convert the assessment into a practical action plan your team can execute.

Tools & Technologies

Industry-leading tools and frameworks I use for this service.

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria
ISO 27001:2022
NIST CSF 2.0
NIST AI RMF
EU AI Act Risk Classification
ISO 42001
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud
IBM Cloud
Docker
Kubernetes
Pinecone
Weaviate
pgvector
OpenAI API
IBM watsonx.ai

Pricing

Transparent pricing options to fit your needs and budget.

Initial Gap Scan
Starting at $1,500/ 1 week
  • AI architecture review
  • Top 5 compliance gaps identified
  • Priority remediation guidance
  • 60-minute debrief call

Best for: Teams needing a fast read before a sales call or vendor questionnaire response

Get Started
Most Popular
Full Readiness Assessment
Starting at $2,500/ 2 weeks
  • Complete AI architecture review
  • Full control gap analysis for SOC 2 or ISO 27001
  • Written gap report with severity ratings
  • Remediation roadmap with effort estimates
  • Pre-audit evidence checklist
  • 90-minute debrief and Q&A

Best for: Founders in active enterprise sales or preparing for a compliance sprint

Get Started
Assessment + Advisory
Starting at $3,500/ 3 weeks
  • Everything in Full Readiness Assessment
  • 30-day follow-up support window
  • Remediation guidance calls as needed
  • Vendor questionnaire response review for one questionnaire
  • Priority guidance for the first remediation sprint

Best for: Teams who want hands-on support through the first phase of remediation

Get Started

All prices are starting points. Final pricing depends on specific requirements. Schedule a consultation for a custom quote.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about compliance readiness assessment.

Is this the same as a penetration test?
No. A penetration test looks for exploitable vulnerabilities in a live system. A Compliance Readiness Assessment maps your architecture and existing controls against the frameworks enterprise buyers require, such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, or the EU AI Act. The output is a gap report and remediation roadmap, not a vulnerability list.
How is this different from hiring a standard compliance consultant?
Most compliance consultants are trained on traditional SaaS frameworks. They may not review vector database namespace enforcement, LLM API key rotation, training data provenance, prompt injection controls, or AI-specific model governance. This assessment is built specifically around AI-native architecture.
Do I need this before starting a SOC 2 sprint?
It is not required, but it is strongly recommended. Many AI-native companies begin SOC 2 preparation and later discover that their AI-specific controls were not properly scoped. This assessment clarifies scope before the sprint begins and reduces the chance of timeline delays or expensive rework.
What does the deliverable actually look like?
You receive a written gap analysis document. Each missing or misconfigured control is documented with its severity rating, the evidence required to close it, and the enterprise buyer question it maps to. The remediation roadmap is a sequenced action plan with realistic effort estimates.

Let's Discuss Your Build Scope

Let's discuss your requirements and find the right solution for your business.

Request a Quote